Bathroom Shower room from Castel can be divided into sliding shower room,shower room door and shower room screen. 6mm/8mm tempered glass and high quality aluminum frame make sure the high quality and safety. It can be widely used in home bathroom or some projects.
Shower Room,Bathroom Shower,Bathroom Shower Enclosure,Tempered Glass Shower Room Foshan Castel IMP&EXP Co.,Ltd , https://www.fscastel.com
According to the information of the official website of the Ministry of Commerce, on January 8, 2016, the US Department of Commerce made a countervailing administrative review of the crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells (whether or not the module was installed). Jingao (Yangzhou) Solar Technology Co., Ltd., Changzhou The subsidy rate of Trina Solar Limited and Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd. was determined to be 19.62%.
In this regard, Wang Hong, president of A-share solar Faucet Dongfang Risheng, commented in an interview. "In any case, on the issue of international trade, China's PV industry should always work together to break down trade barriers and participate in competition fairly. It is the responsibility of the internationally recognized market economy status."
In response to this preliminary review of the US administrative review, Wang Hong believes that “the tax rate for this administrative review is lower than that of the US’s second “double-reverse†final rule. But on the whole, even the enterprises with the lowest tax rate’ The double-reverse 'tax rate is still maintained at more than 20%, which is still unfair to the Chinese PV industry."
The United States has no longer stopped the "double-reverse" of photovoltaics in China.
In November 2011, the US decided to impose a “double-reverse†tariff on photovoltaic cells imported from China. This is also called the first “double-reverse†of US PV to China. Among them, the anti-dumping tax rate is set at 18.32% to 249.96%; the countervailing duty rate is set at 14.78% to 15.97%.
After the first "double opposition", at the end of 2014, the US Department of Commerce determined in the final "double-reverse" finalization of China PV that the dumping margin of China's crystalline silicon photovoltaic products exported to the US was 26.71% to 165.04%. It is 27.64% to 49.79%; the dumping margin of crystalline silicon photovoltaic products exported to the United States in Taiwan is 11.45% to 27.55%.
The so-called second "double anti" is in the scope of investigation, including almost all crystalline silicon photovoltaic products such as ingots, silicon wafers, batteries, and components. At that time, the industry once described to the "Securities Daily" reporter, "This is equivalent to blocking China's deep processing in the third place, and then exporting to the United States to avoid the first "double anti-" road in the United States. The covered door was completely closed."
An informed lawyer stressed to the "Securities Daily" reporter that "the second "double opposition" of the United States to China PV is the first "double anti-" trap, but from the administrative point of view, the two cases are relatively independent. January 8) The preliminary review of the anti-subsidy administrative review announced by the US Department of Commerce is aimed at the first "double anti-" of the US PV to China.
In addition, the lawyer also told reporters, "The reason why the US Department of Commerce only announced the preliminary results of the subsidy rate of the three companies, because other companies have been rescinded in time for the review application, so they have been subsidized the last administrative review. According to the relevant regulations of the United States, there are several possibilities for the original tax rate to be used: First, enterprises that receive zero tax rate for countervailing during the original trial period are not affected by the results of this review; second, if a company does not have a US exports, and timely notification to the US Department of Commerce, and the Ministry of Commerce review confirmed, the company's tax rate is not affected by this review."
Checking and missing the No. 58 document to deal with the US "double opposition"
It must be said that in the context of the large-scale launch of the domestic market and the emergence of more and more emerging markets around the world, today's US market is not as important to the Chinese PV industry as it used to be. "But this does not mean that the US market is not important. It is still one of the markets that all Chinese PV companies strive for." The above-mentioned PV companies, who are not willing to be named, stressed to reporters.
At present, in the industry's view, the only measure that can curb the US “double-reverse†of PV to China is still the anti-dumping measures initiated by China to the US and South Korea's solar-grade polysilicon.
Following January 2014, China implemented “53.3%-57% anti-dumping duties on US imports of solar grade polysilicon†and “2.4%-48.7% anti-dumping duties on imports of solar grade polysilicon from South Korea†and May 1, 2014. After adopting trade remedy measures for the import of solar grade polysilicon from the European Union (a price agreement with WACKER in Germany), the Ministry of Commerce and the General Administration of Customs decided since 2014 that the polysilicon imports under the processing trade in China increased sharply from January to August 2014. From September 1st, the acceptance of the application for import of solar-grade polysilicon processing trade will be suspended (No. 58).
The introduction of this series of measures is based on the substantial damage caused by the dumping behavior of all parties to China's solar-grade polysilicon industry. At the same time, it is also regarded by the industry as the "chip" for China and the United States to negotiate "double-reverse" on China's PV industry. ".
However, although Circular 58 has actually played its role in August last year (the processing trade orders for the approval of the assault have basically been fulfilled), and the composition of China's imports of overseas polysilicon from July to December last year, the China Nonferrous Metals Association Silicon Branch analyzed that Although the No. 58 card that suspends processing trade imports has killed the normal import channels of US solar-grade polysilicon, it has not been able to curb its refusal to levy taxes through re-exporting Taiwan, and because of this, the data shows that it has passed through Taiwan. The proportion of imports that evade “double-reverse†taxation is gradually becoming more prominent. For example, the amount of polysilicon re-exported from Taiwan in July was 966 tons, a substantial increase of 40.6% from the previous month, accounting for 10% of the total imports. Three major import areas.
On this basis, several industry insiders interviewed by Securities Daily have called for management to further cover the loopholes in Circular 58.
On this basis, Wang Hong also predicted to reporters that "the adjustment of the 'double-reverse' tax rate may have a certain impact on the enthusiasm of Chinese PV companies to build factories overseas." An industry insider who did not want to be named added to the "Securities Daily" reporter, "In fact, the cost of building a factory overseas is not low. For example, the labor cost alone is nearly 15% higher than the domestic one."
Abstract The fierce domestic PV market seems to have diluted the attention of the public and even the industry to the highly regarded international trade disputes. So at the end of December last year and recently the US Department of Commerce made a "double anti-" dumping of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells in China (anti-dumping, anti-...
The fiery domestic PV market seems to dilute the public and even the industry's attention to the highly anticipated international trade dispute. As a result, at the end of December last year and recently, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s "double anti-" (anti-dumping, countervailing) administrative review preliminary ruling on China's crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells failed to attract more media attention.